There are many details to work out with this journal, not the least of which will be the submission and review guidelines. Two of the many issues to discuss include the following:
1) Turnaround time
One of the greatest advantages of an online journal, and a fitting one for covering a field which prides itself on rapid posting of information, is the ability to publish articles in a timely fashion. Not constrained by a print publication schedule, we can publish an article as soon as it is reviewed, revised and ready to be uploaded to our site. Naturally, that means also having a quick turnaround time for reviewers. Tim B shared with me that an online journal he works with required from its reviewers a three-week response to submissions. I don't want to impose such a requirement unless we have consensus about such a time frame. As for myself, my background in journalism has led me into the bad habit of lacking motivation until deadlines approach--and thus I'm better off with a short response cycle and don't have the guilt accompanying projects hanging over my head for a long time. And, unless it comes at a bad time in the semester, three weeks is usually sufficient time to juggle a review with my other work.
But, what say you? Is three weeks too onerous? Should we go with a month or more? Or cut it down to two weeks?
2) Submission methods
Since we'll be publishing hypertexts on our website, it makes sense to have the authors submit these same hypertexts--but, do we want to require them to submit them via CD-ROM/DVD? Or just give us a hyperlink to their submission that has been placed on the web--which is probably much better, outside of the concern that the hypertext could be altered during the review process. Thoughts?
Feel free to also use this thread to raise other concerns about the submission/review process. I strongly encourage you to visit the submissions guidelines page for the Kairos journal I mentioned earlier (http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/submissions.html). There are a lot of technical and other guidelines we may want to borrow/revise/consider, and using their guidelines page as a starting point might prevent us from having to reinvent the wheel.